Almost Addicted

J. Wesley Boyd

(This article is a contribution by Lena Butler of Test Country. Thanks Lena!

This blog post isn’t about me, but seeing as how this blog is about profiles of people who deal with addiction, I wrote about someone who is extremely important to the field of addiction research; J. Wesley Boyd, MD, PhD.

Just how important? Well … he:

• belongs to the faculty in psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.

• is a staff psychiatrist at Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH) & at the Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA).

• is co-founder and co-director of the Human Rights and Asylum Clinic at CHA.

• works in the Adolescent Substance Abuse Program at BCH.

• teaches medical ethics and the humanities at Harvard.

• is a graduate of both Yale and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

• penned the book “Almost Addicted: Is my (or my loved one’s) drug use a problem?”

That’s a pretty impressive list of accolades and it’s obvious that Dr. Boyd knows what he’s talking about when it comes to addiction. But if that’s so … how the heck can someone be ‘almost addicted’ to something?

Fortunately, my colleague recently interviewed Dr. Boyd about his book and he explains the phenomenon of being ‘almost addicted.’

It turns out that Dr. Boyd and his colleagues coined the term ‘almost addicted’ to “describe individuals whose drug use does not rise to the level of a formal diagnosis of either substance abuse or substance dependence but who nonetheless are suffering to some extent from their drug-related behaviors.”

Dr. Boyd says that even if someone doesn’t have a full-blown addiction or hasn’t had major difficulties in life because of substance abuse, that person’s drug use can still have a negative impact on their life.

And he adds that if you can catch a person at this almost addicted stage, before their substance abuse becomes a full-on addiction, you might be able to prevent their almost addiction from becoming an actual addiction.

In Dr. Boyd’s book, he tells the story of a person whose use of opiates was considered to be in the almost addicted range for a long time and how it went unchecked and eventually led to a full-on addiction with dire consequences for the person.

Dr. Boyd specifically talks about prescription drug abuse in his book and calls it the fastest growing drug problem nationally, noting that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has classified it as an epidemic.

And he provides the stats to back up the epidemic claim, citing a 2009 survey called Monitoring the Future. According to that survey, “16 million Americans in 2009 used prescription drugs for non-medical purposes at least once in the previous year.” Also, 2.7% of eighth graders and 8% of twelfth graders abused Vicodin in the year prior to the survey and 2.1 percent of eighth graders and 5.1 percent of twelfth graders abused OxyContin.

Eighth graders abusing Vicodin and OxyContin?!? These are 13 and 14-year-old kids we’re talking about here! Yeah, I’d say that’s an epidemic.

And here are more statistics that make Hollywood’s scariest monsters look like your neighbor’s new puppy: 70% of people 12 years or older who abuse prescription drugs obtained them from friends and/or family as opposed to strangers, drug dealers, or others. And almost one third of people who abused drugs for the first time did so by abusing prescription medications in a non-medical manner.

Dr. Boyd attributes the rise in prescription drug abuse to a number of factors. He says doctors might be prescribing more of these drugs than is warranted, which then makes it easier for them to be diverted away from their legitimate medical uses. He also says that because these drugs are prescription medications, they are seen by people as being less dangerous to abuse than illegal drugs (as absurd as that sounds to anyone with common sense). Lastly, drug use seems to be more socially acceptable than in the past. (Thanks for staying classy, mass media.)

Aside from the assumption that these drugs might be somewhat safer than illegal drugs, the actual dangers are pretty much the same; possible overdose, potential for physical dependency, increased potential for driving while intoxicated. But Dr. Boyd doesn’t see them as a bigger problem than illegal drug abuse. They are both huge problems that need to be addressed.

While Dr. Boyd says that all demographics are at risk, he specifically points to young adults, noting that their frontal cortex is not fully developed until the mid-to-late 20s, so people in this age range might be more likely to make bad decisions without considering the possible consequences of those decisions. He also points out that using drugs while the brain is still developing can influence how it develops and result in moderate to significant problems in the future. Youth can also be less susceptible to the sleep inducing effects of some drugs and more susceptible to the euphoria certain drugs produce, making them more at risk than older adults of using more drugs.

It isn’t all bad news, however. Dr. Boyd says the problem of prescription drug abuse is well-known to authorities and addiction experts and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) tracks the prescribing practices of certain physicians and tries to ensure that pain medications are being prescribed legitimately.

In the case of Suboxone, he gives as an example, the DEA began doing random audits of Suboxone prescribers a couple of years ago to try to ensure that Suboxone (which has significant street value) is not being diverted or misused otherwise. Many communities also now have locked drop off facilities in which residents can deposit prescription medications that they are no longer taking in an effort to get more bottles of prescription pills out of medicine cabinets and properly disposed of. (In fact, New Jersey just passed legislation to target prescription drug disposal by health care facilities.)

Re-reading the interview with Dr. Boyd made me think of a friend of mine from college who abuses drugs. (Yes, I still consider him a friend.) The thing about Nick is that he prides himself on not getting into what he calls ‘the hard stuff.’ He’s mostly talking about heroin and meth when he says this (although he has done cocaine, crack, numerous prescription drugs, MDMA/ecstasy, LSD, psychedelic and lots and lots of marijuana). He also avoids injecting anything, preferring instead to smoke, ingest or snort his drugs of choice.

He’s not what I would call a traditional drug addict. For example, he is capable of quitting drugs for several weeks or months at a time (usually to bypass pre-employment drug testing) yet he always goes back. Whenever I see him, he looks and sounds healthy (even becoming pleasantly plump at times) so it’s hard to imagine him as a drug addict. He has lost jobs due to going on drug binges, though, so there’s that.

I think Nick fits into this almost addicted category that Dr. Boyd is talking about, but I have to admit that I’m not totally comfortable with this category even existing. I mean, if your significant other consistently drinks each night but it’s not to get drunk, maybe just to get a nice, lightheaded buzz before bedtime, are they almost addicted to alcohol … or are they addicted? I was a lot more comfortable prior to this whole grey area. Now with this almost addicted label, there is no more just being an addict or not. I guess there isn’t supposed to be anything comfortable about drug addiction (or almost addiction), though.

What do you think? Do you think people can be ‘almost’ addicts or do you think Dr. Boyd is just playing with semantics here? And do you know anyone who fits into Dr. Boyd’s ‘almost addicted’ category? Share your thoughts in the comments section.



  1. Almost addicted? Please! Your friend is an addict because HE ALWAYS GOES BACK. Using the term almost addicted gives addicts an out. You can’t be almost pregnant and you can’t be almost addicted.

    • Thanks for your comment. Just like everything else in life, though, addiction isn’t black and white and I think it’s important to recognize that. As much as we want to draw a line in the sand for the sake of our own morality, that’s just not feasible because there are so many variables to every situation.

  2. I would absolutely agree that a person could be “almost addicted” to a drug or drugs. Using myself as an example and speaking on my lightest experience. I used drugs every single day, in lower than average doses, for eight years. While I was using I completed two years of college while maintaining a GPA of nearly 3.5, was hired by the local Government, promoted twice and often led major projects, and stayed in fairly good health. I decided to end the relationship I was in at the time and, in one day, left the guy and the drugs behind. Even during those 8 years there were weeks (sometimes 6-8 weeks) at a time when I would cease the drug use. I would ultimately start taking them again but it wasn’t due to a physiological or psychological need. I would take them because they were around and I was bored. I never felt a “craving” for them. I would consider my decisions during that time to be because I was “almost addicted.” I don’t think I could have quit in a day (over 3 years ago) if I had a full addiction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: